Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Sick and tired of probing Federation detention facility - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
IIRC those are part of the caldari epic arc and only appear in that one constellation or region. Go elsewhere.
- by Chris Winter - at 2015.02.08 19:57:33
|
2. So, i was running the Gallente Epic arc, and.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xenuria wrote: The way in which most NPCs interact in combat follows different rules than other players. Signature strength for example has no effect on the ability of enemy rats to jam you. Yes it does. It has the expected effect, but NPC j...
- by Chris Winter - at 2015.02.07 17:20:06
|
3. Winter is Coming - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Given the title of the thread, I would like to open discussions of myself or my corp receiving royalties from any money you make.
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.12.28 16:29:11
|
4. Recon Ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andrew Indy wrote: If the tank on a recon was not going up I would not hate this change, but now they will have the Tank of a HAC and be in a lot of situations invisible. Warp into a site, O look a ship with a crap tonne of Tank, can lock me ...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.12.24 05:57:57
|
5. No Isk obtained from Anom sites? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Are you in a wormhole? Are you in a system with one of those newish deployable structures, the ISS or whatever it's called?
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.12.01 18:26:09
|
6. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ArmyOfMe wrote: Deletion of chars To the guy pretending to delete chars, can you please do it on tq rather then sisi the next time? That is TQ. Sisi currently has a different login screen.
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.29 22:25:12
|
7. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pak Narhoo wrote: Chris Winter wrote: One client logged in per player at a time. It's the only way to be fair to all players and encourage playing with other PEOPLE instead of just playing by oneself, and one's offgrid boost alt, and one's f...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.29 10:34:19
|
8. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm actually now of the mind that multiboxing at all gives an unfair advantage and should be banned. One player, one account. People who can afford to have multiple accounts can provide themselves with mining or combat boosts without having to do...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.29 10:22:40
|
9. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can CCP please clarify to their GMs that this new policy isn't going to be in effect until Jan 1st? There are reports of multiboxers already being banned for broadcasting, and re-petitions being closed...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 21:15:34
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
leiutenant George wrote: Quote: Can you even read? The quote you pasted says explicitly that programs which let you "issue the same command to multiple game clients at the same time are allowed." AKA, broadcasting. Can you even read? H...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 10:21:51
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: For another, if I'm pvp'ing against one person, why does that one person get to fight me with multiple ships using a single command relayed across all of them with a script? I don't care if he wants to try to multibox a l...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 10:20:36
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
leiutenant George wrote: kraken11 jensen wrote: Posted - 2010.04.23 15:51:00 Hello there, To make a long story short, automation of gameplay is not permitted; players must be manually issuing the commands to control their character(s...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 10:11:56
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Robert Caldera wrote: Chris Winter wrote: What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription....
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 10:08:07
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What I'm trying to figure out is...why were all of you who claim that ISBoxer gives such a huge advantage not using it? It was explicitly allowed by CCP and costs less than a single EVE subscription. So if it was so powerful in your minds...why w...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 09:58:18
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Odysseus Rhodes wrote: You use a third party program. To play a multiplayer game, single player. Without having to interact, and horde the financial gains. If you truly grind missions like that... make some friends mission with them you will...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 05:53:21
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Chris Winter wrote: EVEMon allows "accelerated game play" by allowing people to more efficiently plan skill queues and check market order status across multiple characters without logging in. EFT/Pyfa allow "accelerated g...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 04:35:30
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EVEMon allows "accelerated game play" by allowing people to more efficiently plan skill queues and check market order status across multiple characters without logging in. EFT/Pyfa allow "accelerated game play" by allowing theorycrafting of fits ...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.11.28 01:53:57
|
18. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: If you want your haulage to be safer, bring the guns. The problem is, with the way ganking works, bringing guns doesn't make your hauling any safer.
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.08.27 21:44:00
|
19. Pretty Much Being Scammed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Apparently no one else has actually noticed the real scam here. T2 shield rigs are basically the least useful rigs to have in an Orca, especially in all three slots. It means you'd have to yank one out in order to put in an ACR to fit a 100mn MWD...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.08.16 08:06:00
|
20. WH entrance bug? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What type of ship was it? Did the pilots that didn't see him possibly have different standings for the guy than the pilots that did see him? In case overview is filtering by standing...
- by Chris Winter - at 2014.08.01 19:40:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |